Header Ziff Davis Enterprise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Monday, March 16, 2009 11:57 AM/EST

Fastest Browser Fight Is Pointless

Jim RapozaAccording to a recent series of tests done by Microsoft, Internet Explorer 8 is the fastest browser available today. Of course, it doesn't take a lot of searching to find similar studies claiming that Google Chrome or Firefox or Safari or Opera or WebKit is the fastest browser available today.

So what do I think about all of these "fastest browser" tests? Which do I think is the most valid? Well, in the immortal words of Bill Murray in Meatballs, "It just doesn't matter!"

That's right. When it comes to the modern Web and modern Web browsers, the last thing that most people should care about when choosing a browser is its speed.

Sure, browser performance used to matter. When I did browser comparisons in the 1990s, I did more than my fair share of performance tests.

But when I did those tests I used a stopwatch and saw differences in performance that sometimes reached minutes!

In these modern series of Web browser speed tests, the differences in performance are often measured in milliseconds. That literally means that if you blink you'll miss the difference in speed between one browser and the next.

Face it, right now all browsers are more than fast enough. And if you're running into slow performance on the Web, you should probably check about 100 other things (ISP performance, site problems, etc.) before you start wondering about browser speed.

So why is every single browser maker spending so much time and resources trying to gain the mantle of fastest Web browser? I think it's because performance is the only non-objective criteria that they can hang their hat on.

Most people choose a browser because they like how it works, they like the feature set or the UI or the extensibility or that they are just comfortable with it. But while it's hard to tell a developer to make a browser that people will like, it's much easier to tell them to come up with some way that they can say that their browser is faster than the competition.

But right now this is all a waste of time and resources. We would all be much better off if browser makers were spending these resources on important tasks like making browsers more secure.

Sure, someday performance might matter in browsers, especially when it comes to JavaScript performance. We may see applications that are so big and complex that these millisecond speed differences will become longer and more noticeable.

But right now we are just measuring the differences between browsers that are fast and others that are also fast. And it just doesn't matter.

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://etech.eweek.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/16665

Comments (7)

Kevin :

I disasgree completely. Javascript performance can vary tenfold between browsers, and it makes a big difference on Web 2.0 applications. We've developed a mapping application using MapPoint web services, and IE 7 is 8 times slower than Chrome or FireFox 3.1 in our tests.

ponet2000 :

That's so true.
This conflict is be less of pointless than stunt.

Deb :

This guy doesn't understand the web. Sure, all the browsers are the same when pulling up a website like Google.com, which is streamlined in the first place. When you pull up more complicated websites like Kevin mentions above, it makes a huge difference to have a faster javascript engine. Most of our favorite websites are getting more and more complex, so browsers like Chrome and Firefox are building for the future.

Fred Stenner :

"But right now we are just measuring the differences between browsers that are fast and others that are also fast. And it just doesn't matter." (

Posted by Jim Rapoza on March 16, 2009 11:57 AM)

is so true !

one can have a super fast browser but a slow connection to the internet then your just spinning your wheels in wet slippery mud going somewhere vary slow. wasting lot of horse power on nothing more then a envy contest

Ian :

I echo the comments of other posters regarding java script processing. The browser performance is paramount. Firefox 3 handily outperforms IE 7 whereas most of the customers for the apps I am involved with are enterprise customers locked into IE. Their corporate networks are all (more or less) up to the job so the browser performance with Java Script is shaping up to be the biggest hurdle in getting decent performance. High hopes for IE 8....

Johnie :

Was this article a joke? Yeah maybe if you are running it on your quad core you don't realize much of a difference, but for the savvy and average user speed and footprint are things that will have an effect on how many pages we can open and even how fast it will accomplish the task we are so desperately trying to get done. WAKE UIP, this is the year of the netbook.

Steve :

Whether the speed is relevant or not is all personal. 95% of users can't tell the difference browsing between FF and Chrome. But for the 5% that can, the javascript setup can be significant. The reality is a very low percentage of users even know what that is referencing to. I think the security of a browser is more important than a small variance in speed (given you don't regularly go to sites that push the limits on a less than ideal connection); for security knowledge I look at a site like this*.

Post a Comment

 
 


Emerging Technology
COLLABORATION
Citrix
Citrix GoView Has Promise 
Review: Citrix GoView makes it possible to create recordings of application sessions.

DESKTOPS & NOTEBOOKS
netbooks
Netbooks Make Perfect Sense 
Analysis: With their perfect size and price, netbooks are destined to stick around.

Advertisement
Advertisement